No Cooley, they dont. However, I have a hard time believing you didnt chew the same dirt at some point I still do today. To me, in this case, both parties were at fault, but one to a much greater extent simply by way of being intoxicated. I dont think Stallworth should do a dime, but I think 30 days given the intoxication factor in the accident is insufficient.
Well, since you have not READ it, you must be excusing it right? Can you seriously sit there and say had he not been out drinking all night, and instead been at home or driven home since he was legally intoxicated he could have prevented the accident? If the evidence is not being reported I would think that would indicate it was not there. I am simply not willing to make some assumptions you appear comfortable making.
From what I hear the available evidence is out there, minus what i know your probably looking for, the accident report which would tell someone like you were or I am the factors you need to make your decision. If anyone knows somewhere the accident report is posted Id love to see it.
So what is the going rate in your opinion for the loss of a loved one Cooley? I would imagine that would have to be determined on a case by case basis. Did I give you any impression I had an amount in mind?
There is no price guys. Ive never met the survivors of a person killed in a car crash who would accept any amount of money in lieu of their family.
Why is it wrong to want a representative prison sentance for a death? Because not every death has an applicable representative prison sentence.
Now this is true, but I also think Phic needs to explain or reword this response.