chrisslabaugh
:dunno:
I start the best threads :clap: :thrash:
Damn, that's a easy one, you even quoted it for me:
If you weren't making trying to make an argument that he is showing a declining skill set than why did you respond?? I didn't call you out by name so you would have had to assume it was you and then made the decision to try to defend your argument.....notice, I said nothing about declining numbers....I was very specific: declining skill set
And you responded that is was EASY....here are YOUR WORDS again
So....you still want to claim you never stated his skills were declining??? YOu may want to realize what you are posting next time.....
damn, you may backpedal quick enough to cover Marshall....your words are posted....backpedal all you want.....your argument reeks....your backpeddeling just proves it even more......
Back to the draft, your back and forth is silly and boring....
And if CC does not feel his skill set is in decline then I guess he really agrees with me and is not making the argument that his skill set is in decline.Sorry, I don't see how anyone can make a logical argument that a guy who has surpassed 100 rec in each ofc the last 3 years and is only 26 is showing a declining skill set.
With the draft over and since CC really wants to tell everyone how he really didn't mean what he wrote many times in this thread.....let the fun continue.....
But if he doesn't feel his skill set is in decline then I guess there really isn't a disagreement since all along all my comment was:
And if CC does not feel his skill set is in decline then I guess he really agrees with me and is not making the argument that his skill set is in decline.
I don't agree with your approach/tactics. Still waiting for you to point out when I made the allegation? Attempted to make a point but I'm not surprised it was totally misinterpreted by you and e.
Good luck.
Still waiting for you to point out when I made the allegation? Attempted to make a point but I'm not surprised it was totally misinterpreted by you and e.
Sorry, I don't see how anyone can make a logical argument that a guy who has surpassed 100 rec in each ofc the last 3 years and is only 26 is showing a declining skill set.
Posted via Mobile Device
Easy - compared to where he started there has been signs of a decline. I don't believe you will find in any of my posts that as a result he is no longer an upper tier WR.
Late to the.. umm.. party, and I didn't read all 5 pages, but I'd go with team 1 due to the fact that it's the only team with 2 young keeper studs in Wells and Maclin.
Also, Peyton loses a tiny bit of value in a format that devalues QB touchdowns, so Eli isn't as much of a downgrade as it may appear.