Top-6? When this discussion started I thought it was top-8?
And you may want to squash the "man-crush" cliche'. Most people personally don't care about anything else outside of how many points he rakes in for a fantasy team by year's end. The fact is, he was fantastic as a 1st year player, and he represents nothing but upside due to his team's offseason additions. He's really no different than DeWill and Turner, both of whom you always rank higher, in that he's only had one season of relevance.
This is about you randomly underrating a guy for no tangible reason and getting called out on it. It's akin to you constantly referring to Peterson as the 4th overall best RB and saying it's because he doesn't catch many passes out of the backfield or something.
All I can say is WOW! As in, this post is way off base:
1) Top 6 or 8, who cares? I used top 6 because that is about as far as I have seen him fall, which means I would probably have to take him top 6, which I won't. That number had nothing to do with the previous post where top 8 was referenced.
2)Didn't realize the man-crush "cliche" would offend you so much. But what else can you call it when a 2nd year player with a 3.9 YPC is talked about like he is one of the greats of the game? Forte had good numbers because he had a ton of opportunity. Still averaged under 4 a carry and while that is not relevant to FF when looking back at a season, it says that maybe he isn't the kind of back who can have a big season without getting the same amount of opportunity again. Again, I just wasn't impressed that much and don't expect a repeat numbers wise. Also, the suggestion that those passing on Forte early were making a huge mistake is unfounded. There are plenty of players who have the talent and situation to out perform Forte, so just a matter of choice.
3)Nothing but up upside due to the additions to the team? Sorry, no. Less opportunity equals less statistics in most situations. Don't think they got Cutler to hand the ball off.
4) While I don't remember doing enough posting on this site to "always" rank Williams and Turner higher, I would take both of them before Forte. Williams is an amazing combination of power and speed and has much more big play capability. Every highlight of a Panther game seemed to be of the back of his jersey as he ran away from everyone. Even with a 60/40 split, he will put up big numbers in that offense, with that line and the fewer carries will help keep him healthy. Turner is another guy who simply has more talent than Forte although his being non-existent in the passing game would be a concern if I was playing in a PPR.
5) As far as randomly underrating a guy, nothing random about it. He had an excellent 08 because of the huge amount of opportunity he had. The YPC concerns me and again, I just don't see the raw talent that makes me want to spend a high pick on him. Nothing personal. If I thought he could help me win, I would draft him. I also don't think having Cutler will help him that much statistically, as they will pass more and he will have less opportunity, and unlike someone like Williams, he won't do more with less.
6) As far as being "called out", I didn't realize we were back in 5th grade. You have given no more reason to justify where you will pick him than I have on why I wouldn't. You think he has upside because of Cutler coming in, I think it will give him less opportunity. You think he is the 2nd coming, I think he over achieved statistically because he was the only option last year. Time will tell who is right.
BTW, I have never and probably won't in the immediate future rank Peterson anywhere but number one, even in PPR leagues...............:shake: