Cooley Cadets
Banned
Glad to hear Bennett is continuing to impress as the team needs positive improvement from the position.
Has Julio Iglesias made an impression yet?
Has Julio Iglesias made an impression yet?
Hester is more viable than the last two years just from the standpoint that he has much more familiarity with running routes. Add to that the fact that he now has a QB who can launch it deeper and through tighter windows then he has ever had. The deep throws stretch the field allowing his speed to be even more dangerous. Now they will have to commit to how they want to cover him. Cutler can nail him 65 yards down the field. If they simply try to cover him deep, he can break it off and move the chains underneath. The same scenario was available with Orton, but arm strength shortened the field of coverage. Hester does present a dilema that teams will have to prepare for. Add to that the fact that they have a nice TE, and a safety valve in a Forte. This is a whole new dynamic in Chicago.Gotta admit the initial reports are more favorable than I had originally anticipated. Granted the sources are a little biased but none the less they now have some players I need to pay a little more attention to.
I still have trouble accepting Hester as a viable WR that I can depend on so even with the continuing emergence of Bennett someone like Davis, Forte, Olsen or even Clark has to develop a rapport with Cutler and Jay's comment may be the indicator that Forte could have another fine season - top 5 in a redraft??? We'll see.
Jay's comment may be the indicator that Forte could have another fine season - top 5 in a redraft??? We'll see.
Shock....but we may just agree here.....that means we'll add 2 more pages in how we disagree about our agreementI will never discount the threat Hester provides the team just not convinced on how reliable/consistent he is at the position. Would feel much more comfortable with an established dependable WR across from him. Bennett may become that but he is not there yet.
You are dead on about the drastic change in team dynamics.
I agree on Hester, he is not a true #1. This Bears offense still needs that #1 WR IMO. Bennett is a nice sleeper, and Hester will show flashes, but If they would add a dynamic receiver this offense could take off IMO. Could be the only thing it is missing, though I admit I am not up to speed on the state of their Oline.
Shock....but we may just agree here.....that means we'll add 2 more pages in how we disagree about our agreement
I agree on Hester, he is not a true #1. This Bears offense still needs that #1 WR IMO. Bennett is a nice sleeper, and Hester will show flashes, but If they would add a dynamic receiver this offense could take off IMO. Could be the only thing it is missing, though I admit I am not up to speed on the state of their Oline.
I think as the 09 season progresses, 1 of the Chicago WRs will emerge as a #1. Cutler will find his guy, and whoever that is will be a 65+ receptions, 1000 Yd dude.
*Paging Earl Bennett...
:biglaugh:Great - now you have me re-evaluating the Chicago O. There must be a disconnect here because the planets are not scheduled to be aligned to allow a Miller/Cadet agreement anytime soon.
Unless someone is signed you are asking quite a bit from Bennett so quickly but it will be what they need.
Let me throw one wrinkle into this......I agree that if Cutler finds his Royal it will be a huge boost, but for there is be a Royal doesn't there need to be a Marshall to take the heat off of the Royal? Royal's consistent success was in part due to having a big time play maker across the field from him to take pressure off. That is why I say they are missing that big piece to the puzzle. If they can get a big time play maker on the outside, it opens up everything else and allows it to flow consistently. Without it, my fear is you will only see flashes of what this offense could achieve.Someone is going to have a break out season. With the strong rushing attack and the constant underneath work to Forte and Olsen, 1 of those WRs is going to be getting open from time to time.
If Cutler finds his Royal, it's going to be game on! There WILL BE a fantasy gem in the Chicago WR corps this year. This gem will also not be named Hester.
That starts to narrow it down...
How elite of a wideout are we talking here Miller? (Fitz and Moss class, or Jennings class) Not many teams have that, and not many have much better of a TE, or a 3 down back who will likely have 50+receptions. I totally agree that a top Wr would make this offense scary good, but they will be pretty darn good anyway with Cutler. IMHO
Re: Royal's big game 1.
Not to take anything away from it, but also consider no one knew anything about him and he did not attract any defensive pressure or attention in the planning process. Kinda caught them off gaurd and proved to be a heck of a talent. What we are talking about here is sustained success....to do that you need that lightning rod to draw the attention outside.
Good point. But do we think anyone on Chicago's roster even has the talent of Royal?I get what you're saying Miller, but I want to review that game a little more closely.
Denver was opening the season against Oakland. Oakland had a pair of disgusting CBs in DeAngelo Hall and Asomugha. Even if they didn't know who Eddie Royal was, doesn't mean that these guys didn't come to play on opening weekend. It is likely that Royal had 1 of these studs draped all over him all game long. It's not like just because Marshall was gone that Oakland decided to ignore the passing attack of Denver in a divisional game on opening weekend.
I realize that Chicago does not have a Brandon Marshall type WR, but my point is that I feel that the offense will be good enough in a different way that it will open up space for 1 of the Chicago WRs to have a very nice season.