Search results

Runnik your Bay area blinders are awe inspiring. I am confident that there will be at LEAST 4-5 other WR who will have a more successful career than this little little man. I hope he proves me wrong but he is TINY......... I think he will have a very limited role wherever he falls and is a...

I have been scolded twice for either implying or directly saying names so I cannot do the third time. This guy is a VERY poor man's Desean Jackson. The WR class as I see it is not that weak and I do not see how anyone can say that MCCLUSTER should go where he went. I love the debate that this...

I have been scolded twice for either implying or directly saying names so I cannot do the third time. This guy is a VERY poor man's Desean Jackson. The WR class as I see it is not that weak and I do not see how anyone can say that MCCLUSTER should go where he went. I love the debate that this...

I dont agree. Why would you draft a jack of all trades who is not outstanding in any one area, in the 2nd rd when you could get an elite WR and take care of some of the other needs later in the draft?

I dont agree. Why would you draft a jack of all trades who is not outstanding in any one area, in the 2nd rd when you could get an elite WR and take care of some of the other needs later in the draft?

Surely to God, you are not saying that MCLUSKER is the next Brandon MARSHALL.

I get that. I really do. I just think that TB needs a better WR than MCLUSKER is.

I get that. I really do. I just think that TB needs a better WR than MCLUSKER is.

I think Roddy White was a 4th rounder. I am not saying that there are no stud wideouts taken in rd 2. I am saying that MCLUSKER is not a Rd two WR.

I think Roddy White was a 4th rounder. I am not saying that there are no stud wideouts taken in rd 2. I am saying that MCLUSKER is not a Rd two WR.

I respect and support the take local ideology, but there are just too many other options at WR to take MCCLUSTER this early. TB needs a stud WR because Stroughter is not a stud, he will contribute but they need a big, tough playmaking WR. I love him too but in my opinion, there is no way he is...

I respect and support the take local ideology, but there are just too many other options at WR to take MCCLUSTER this early. TB needs a stud WR because Stroughter is not a stud, he will contribute but they need a big, tough playmaking WR. I love him too but in my opinion, there is no way he is...

I agree its a nice addition but do not think he was the best WR left on the board. He is speedy but is not in my opinion, WR1 material, that TB needs.

I agree its a nice addition but do not think he was the best WR left on the board. He is speedy but is not in my opinion, WR1 material, that TB needs.

He will get an increase in carries but it will remain a RBBC situation in New York. I would not trade BENSON to you for BRADSHAW if I had BENSON.

I went with JONES as he was the best DT left on the board. The need for a solid DT in Oakland is so great that it necessitated the pick here. I could also have went OL but with the depth that remains, Ill wait till rd 3.

With the seventh pick in the second round of the Sports Outlaw 2010 Mock Draft, the Oakland Raiders select Arthur Jones, DT, Syracuse Read more: http://www.sofantasyfootball.com/nfl/f196/1st-2010-national-football-league-mock-round-2-a-33155/#post360339#ixzz0dxgmPk6C

I was planning on taking another guy.

I think it is a great pick since the Chiefs also have a mid-Second round pick.

Is that bad ass or BAD ass?