Search results

Forte and Rawls NOS will be behind early and often and will have to abandon any hope of a run game early on. Langford's upside will be capped by Forte as the starter and vice versa for Forte somewhat but I see him as an RB2 with Langford more as a Flex.

Yep, looks to be the right call. I was at my daughter's recital and couldn't really do any research on my phone on DET's run D lately, which is why I posted here to get some help. But no one saw the doghouse thing. As you said CTL, bizarre.

I know he can't say anything early but late in the 3rd Sims says something about no one mentioned Lacy's name to him when talking to the Packers about their offensive game plan before the game. As if he did something during practice that might have put him in the doghouse. How can no "insider"...

Thanks guys.

Agree on the volume he may see, but ARI knows that too. That's the only concern.

Thanks Phic... I was questioning Gurley versus ARI... He has continued to decline consistently over the last 5-6 weeks. But don't know if I have the stones to bench him over McFadden.

Gurley (v ARI) Lacy (@DET) McFadden (@WAS) Freeman (@ TBB)

No real main target in PHI so Ertz is getting looks regularly like the rest of the receivers but never the focal point in a game (10+ targets). Borles is proving to be better than expected, but A.Rob is his main guy with Hurns playing second fiddle. In limited games Thomas has already had a 10+...

When I attended Syracuse they used that on extra points. I don't remember them ever "catching" anyone, so they'd alway roll back into normal formation and kick the PAT.

Wow, what the heck was Whalen doing snapping that ball... lol. I can only assume the guy in the QB position was yelling "hut!" to try to draw them offsides, but Whalen just reacted and snapped it... bwahahahaha One of the most insane plays I've seen.

Yep, I'll also back the Ingram start.

Non-ppr, standard scoring A.Morris or A.Robinson?

Talib traditionally doesn't do as well against smaller WRs, but I think Hyde will get more volume than Smith. Yeldon's going to have tough sledding against CAR. A: Hyde

And for the record this never happened. ESPN even apologized a few weeks ago for reporting it.

I told anyone that would listen that they were nuts for valuing Gerhart going into last year. In most cases though, that was for Redraft. Give Yeldon a year or two, while JAX starts improving and I think he'll show why he's not Sankey. Just don't expect much in 2015. But I do think JAX sticks...

I think Yeldon is being overlooked some. Not the pedigree of Gurley, but he has a similar situation to Gordon, just not on as good of a team. But with the pieces JAX has put in place (Robinson, Lee, Thomas, Bortles) I think there's reasons to be optimistic on Yeldon's future.

Not disagreeing but Sammy Watkins was in the same position. Do you pass on Gurley or Gordon to take Watkins, knowing what you know now? Young studs WRs are gold now, especially since Julio and AJ, but who since them has elevated to true stud level, not the promise/hype of a stud? Everyone's...

If there's no way to get the 1.03 then I think there are 2 options given your players: Gurley, Cooper, White, Yeldon Or Gurley, Gordon, White, and trade the 1.05 for a later pick (where you take a 2nd tied WR) and a 1st next year.

Your current RBs would dictate Gurley and Gordon with the first two picks. That likely means giving up Cooper (1.03) and getting White + ? with the 4th and 5th. Any chance of making a deal from 1.05 to 1.03? Or even 1.04 to 1.03? Because I do think Cooper will be worth it.