Remote Controller
Well-Known Member
I guess I just don't see it. Why are they considered such a great team? I see a top 5 Qb......maybe, if healthy. All we have to go by is his rookie year. I see two new backs and two old backs so that position really hasn't changed. That's an upper middle of the pack RB group with a scheme that does include a good dose of running. The Wr's are middle of the pack at best, and once again we need to talk staying healthy when we speak of Jeffrey. Agohlar is good, not great, and Desean is supposedly tearing it up. Ertz and Goedert make a a real good TE squad.
The Defense is upper middle of the pack.....Jake Elliot was under 50% on fg's this preseason, yet this team is picked as the cream of the NFC by the majority. I feel New Orleans has a better kicker, better defense, better Rb's, better Wr's, are fine at TE, and have a qb whosimply gets it done and stays upright. Playing Dallas, New York, and Washington has to have a lot to do with this. I just don't see the Eagles as the cream of the NFC. I'm not hating.....I own Ertz, Howard, DeSean, Elliot, Jeffrey on different squads......I just don't see it.
The Rams have a better Def, and better running back group, much better Wr's, an equal at QB who stays healthy. They are better too.
Anyway, not a rant, just a question???
The Defense is upper middle of the pack.....Jake Elliot was under 50% on fg's this preseason, yet this team is picked as the cream of the NFC by the majority. I feel New Orleans has a better kicker, better defense, better Rb's, better Wr's, are fine at TE, and have a qb whosimply gets it done and stays upright. Playing Dallas, New York, and Washington has to have a lot to do with this. I just don't see the Eagles as the cream of the NFC. I'm not hating.....I own Ertz, Howard, DeSean, Elliot, Jeffrey on different squads......I just don't see it.
The Rams have a better Def, and better running back group, much better Wr's, an equal at QB who stays healthy. They are better too.
Anyway, not a rant, just a question???