Can you say Oakland and Jon Gruden?Bengals DC Paul Guenther is leaving to pursue other opportunities.
Can you say Oakland and Jon Gruden?Bengals DC Paul Guenther is leaving to pursue other opportunities.
Rooney rule is such a joke. I feel bad for the guy being interviewed knowing he has no chance for the job.
Rooney rule is such a joke. I feel bad for the guy being interviewed knowing he has no chance for the job.
Disagree completely! Rooney rule is one of the best initiates the NFL has adopted. The only problem is when teams want that big name splash without vetting candidates like Oakland is doing.
The rule is designed to get minority candidates exposure and ultimately opportunity which it has done. Even if a team has a predetermined choice in mind, interviewing other individuals still gives those people exposure and creates a chance for them to become noticed for future considerations.
When a GM is looking for a new HC his most reliable source of information for potential candidates is other GMs.
HC jobs are not positions that you announce in your local classifieds. If my local team needs a HC I can't just go down and put in an application. Teams 'invite' individuals to come in and 'interview' for the position. Most of the time the individual that is 'invited' is someone that is known throughout the GM circles. So those individuals always ended up being people that the GM's knew first hand or were currently on the staff in other capacities which I am sure you can see would lead to a very limited number of candidates. Why do you think HC's that fail keep getting recycled (Norv Turner, Dave Wannstedt, Marion Campbell, Kevin Gilbride, etc, etc, etc.)
If you don't interject some type of system to get new blood into the mix then you will continue to only have that same 'good 'ol boys' network where the only new blood comes through your existing staff.
Now GM's are exposed to individuals they would have never even known to consider.
Even if a candidate is not offered the position they can impress enough that the GM will recommend that person to his other GM friends for interview when they are in need of HC candidates. Thus exposure and greater opportunity.
"Luck" isn't the appropriate word. Houston was rolling with Watson. Might've made the playoffs.Bill O'Brien safe. He gets lucky because Watson got injured.
Why isn't there a rule to have to interview a female candidate? Don't they need exposure too?Disagree completely! Rooney rule is one of the best initiates the NFL has adopted. The only problem is when teams want that big name splash without vetting candidates like Oakland is doing.
The rule is designed to get minority candidates exposure and ultimately opportunity which it has done. Even if a team has a predetermined choice in mind, interviewing other individuals still gives those people exposure and creates a chance for them to become noticed for future considerations.
When a GM is looking for a new HC his most reliable source of information for potential candidates is other GMs.
HC jobs are not positions that you announce in your local classifieds. If my local team needs a HC I can't just go down and put in an application. Teams 'invite' individuals to come in and 'interview' for the position. Most of the time the individual that is 'invited' is someone that is known throughout the GM circles. So those individuals always ended up being people that the GM's knew first hand or were currently on the staff in other capacities which I am sure you can see would lead to a very limited number of candidates. Why do you think HC's that fail keep getting recycled (Norv Turner, Dave Wannstedt, Marion Campbell, Kevin Gilbride, etc, etc, etc.)
If you don't interject some type of system to get new blood into the mix then you will continue to only have that same 'good 'ol boys' network where the only new blood comes through your existing staff.
Now GM's are exposed to individuals they would have never even known to consider.
Even if a candidate is not offered the position they can impress enough that the GM will recommend that person to his other GM friends for interview when they are in need of HC candidates. Thus exposure and greater opportunity.
Really nice post Deacon and you made some good points there. Over all though I think the rule sucks in general. I would not want to be the guy that was interviewed just because of my skin color. That smacks of racism to me. In the case of the Raiders I think it is ridiculous for them to "have to" interview a minority candidate before inking the guy they want.
The only recourse right now would be proving that's the reason you did not get interviewed in a court of law the same way most other racial issues are settled. Then I'd add that as an owner I should be able to hire who ever I desired. If I'm a card carrying member of the good ole boy club and I want to hire an old white man I think I should be able to but that's a story for another day.
They didn't think it necessary to share this and who they talked to? This, this right here is part of the NFL problem. What a mess. They just don't seem to learn.The league has informed the Fritz Pollard Alliance that the Raiders fulfilled the Rooney Rule in their head-coaching search by interviewing two minority candidates.
The Fritz Pollard Alliance promotes diversity in coaching. According to SiriusXM's Adam Caplan, one of the Raiders' interviews was apparently in-house TEs coach Bobby Johnson. The other is unknown. Fulfilling the Rooney Rule was believed to be the Raiders' final hurdle in luring Jon Gruden out of the ESPN booth.
Source: Josina Anderson on Twitter
Wow, big sacrifice there, 2 winning seasons and their first win in Playoffs in forever. It would have been a crock if they had fired him if he lost.Titans coach Mike Mularkey will return in 2018.