WesDawg
'Burghapologist
I realize this topic was beat into the ground last year and now it's back in the forefront of the sports newspage, but here is just one of a million different takes on how to best set up a superconference structure. I took into consideration that these conferences could tell the NCAA to either adopt a playoff system or get bent, tried to maintain geographical relevence/rivalries, and maintain as much competitive balance as possible. I also took some of the more respectable currently non-BCS schools and sprinkled them in to help balance out the divisions within conferences. Some omissions could be absorbed into these leagues for basketball purposes. (Vanderbilt, UNLV, etc)
Big East (North): Boston College, Syracuse, UConn, Rutgers, Pitt, Penn St, Louisville, Kentucky
Big East (South): West Virginia, Maryland, Virginia, Va Tech, North Carolina, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest
SEC (East): Georgia, Georgia Tech, South Florida, Florida, Central Florida, Miami, Clemson, South Carolina
SEC (West): Florida St, Auburn, Alabama, Tennessee, Ole Miss, Miss St, LSU, Arkansas
Heartland (formerly Big 10)
East: Ohio St, Cincinnati, Indiana, Notre Dame, Purdue, Michigan, Michigan St, Northwestern
West: Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Iowa St, Missouri, Kansas, Kansas St, Illinois
Mid-South (Formerly Big 12)
North: Nebraska, Colorado, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Tulsa, Baylor
South: Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, TCU, SMU, Houston
Big West (Formerly Pac-10)
North: Oregon, Oregon St, Washington, Washington St, Boise St, Stanford, Cal
South: USC, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona St, Utah, BYU, Nevada
Why would this work? Why would it not?
Before you worry about traditional yearly rivalries, consider that most regional rivalries would be intact, some older rivalries would be resurrected, and with this model in place, the number of non-conference games would be reduced drastically. 1 or 2 at the most with a 12-game regular season schedule. That could be your rivalry game, and would all but eliminate the worthless patsy 55-10 games we see scattered throughout the first 3 weeks of the current regular season.
Big East (North): Boston College, Syracuse, UConn, Rutgers, Pitt, Penn St, Louisville, Kentucky
Big East (South): West Virginia, Maryland, Virginia, Va Tech, North Carolina, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest
SEC (East): Georgia, Georgia Tech, South Florida, Florida, Central Florida, Miami, Clemson, South Carolina
SEC (West): Florida St, Auburn, Alabama, Tennessee, Ole Miss, Miss St, LSU, Arkansas
Heartland (formerly Big 10)
East: Ohio St, Cincinnati, Indiana, Notre Dame, Purdue, Michigan, Michigan St, Northwestern
West: Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Iowa St, Missouri, Kansas, Kansas St, Illinois
Mid-South (Formerly Big 12)
North: Nebraska, Colorado, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Tulsa, Baylor
South: Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, TCU, SMU, Houston
Big West (Formerly Pac-10)
North: Oregon, Oregon St, Washington, Washington St, Boise St, Stanford, Cal
South: USC, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona St, Utah, BYU, Nevada
Why would this work? Why would it not?
Before you worry about traditional yearly rivalries, consider that most regional rivalries would be intact, some older rivalries would be resurrected, and with this model in place, the number of non-conference games would be reduced drastically. 1 or 2 at the most with a 12-game regular season schedule. That could be your rivalry game, and would all but eliminate the worthless patsy 55-10 games we see scattered throughout the first 3 weeks of the current regular season.