You're right. The rule in the CBA only affects players who are in the last year of their deals...but you don't have to be a d*ck about it. I wasn't calling you an idiot. And I'm pretty sure the post you quoted didnt say anything about losing an accrued year toward free agency because i realized that isnt an issue for him after i made the post on page one. I'm simply trying to spark debate. Isn't that the point of this forum?
Anyway, the issue of tying up the Titan's cap hasn't been addressed. Plenty of players take less than they want or less than market value so the team can bring in more talent.
Look...I understand why he's holding out, but I just don't agree with holdouts in general.
All I know is that I traded high on dude. He will get his contract, show up out of shape and get injured in the 1st 4 weeks of the regular season.
Riding the gurney making 8 mil.
What a life!
What did you get for him? Hope you got high dollar and didn't settle due to fear of the unknown.
Exactly. Although, I wouldn't put Blount in the same category as McCluster or Choice...but good point.
The Packers proved last year that you don't really need a solid run game to win. The Pats have also won without a star RB like CJ.
Isn't calling people idiots in general kinda being a dick (not that I mind, I kinda like debating with dicks?? And I'm just doing what you say you want to do....debate....I just don't get why you crashing down on CJ here when the guy is the clear cut best weapon on his team, signed on his rookie deal, and could get hurt and CUT with no guarantee at any time. As I stated, in general, I am not sticking up for holdouts, but there are exceptions, and this is one of them. If that was my kid, there is no way i could advise him to play under that deal knowing there is nothing for him if he gets hurt. And the insurance you speak of.....ok, take out a couple mil in insurance, that is going to make up for his 20-30 mil guaranteed he can get in his next deal?
As far as him taking less.....I have no issue with any player getting paid what they can get. It is not their responsibility to manage caps for the GM's. The Titans will be a much better team in the long run if they get the deal done instead of risk losing him for nothing.....then I guess they would have plenty of cap room right???
So lighten up a little and debate, just b/c I disagree with you and like to be a smart ass doesn't mean I am being a dick...or maybe it does, but either way, we can still have a good debate
Ok...I guess we're both dicks
part of me wants to keep arguying this with you. But the true definition of insanity is to keep doing the exact same thing, and expecting a different result.Phicinfan...you defend CJ as if you're on his payroll
The Titans already offered to make him the highest paid RB in league history. CJ is just greedy and wants more. From a business standpoint, why pay a guy Tom Brady money when everyone knows RBs have a short shelf life. CJ could be dunzo in 2 years for all we know.
Also, the reason why CJ is an idiot is because he is going to kill his team's cap room and they won't be able to bring in quality players so the team can compete. Look what Peyton did...he took well below market value to save the team money so they can resign other players.
Look at the Detroit Red Wings...players take less money to play for a winner. If Lidstrom demanded $15 million per season (which is probably what he is worth even at his age), the Wings wouldn't be able to sign guys like Zetterberg, Datsyk, Franzen, etc.
Ok...enough hockey talk...this is football. I agree CJ needs to get paid, but I just think he is being a selfish, money-hungry, greedy, POS.
Combination of both.
Got Faddy and Vjax.
Fear of the unknown wasn't in play here. It was more the fear of yesterdays known becoming today's unknown.
Guys just don't repeat like they used to.
BUT.....if your talking injury risk, don't ya think Faddy is just as much of a risk given his history?
Missing camp might not be a big deal for him. RB's take a beating, and having your franchise RB take less of a beating through TC might not be a bad thing.....BUT, your concern of an injury like a tweaked hammy, in the first couple weeks, is legit. Going out 4 weeks though is a bit much, I think anything after the first couple really won't be attributed to the hold out at all, just the basic risk of playing RB in the NFL.
What did you get for him? Hope you got high dollar and didn't settle due to fear of the unknown.
Surprised you wasted your time responding to that Jeremy.
Look what Peyton did...he took well below market value to save the team money so they can resign other players.
I agree CJ needs to get paid, but I just think he is being a selfish, money-hungry, greedy, POS.
So can management (owners) do the same thing. If they give CJ 20 million a year for 5 years and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year he plays average...almost like crap.........can they ask for their money back?
So can management (owners) do the same thing. If they give CJ 20 million a year for 5 years and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year he plays average...almost like crap.........can they ask for their money back?
I agree he is well underpaid nut you never negoiate with a player that has more then just a year left on his contract...CJ has 2.
JMHO, of course