Financial terms are not yet available, but Johnson was believed to be targeting roughly $8 million annually. Expect an annoucement at 9am central today.
:dunno: Sure looks like it. If so, Cincy should go now!! he is solid as receiver and runner, and could be an everydown back to go with whoever they draft. I like him over Bush, by a mile.Did I miss something? I did not see Buffalo tag Fred Jackson.....is he headed to FA?
Did I miss something? I did not see Buffalo tag Fred Jackson.....is he headed to FA?
he is unless the tagged him; I don't believe he has been extended, has he?i don't believe jackson is a free agent.
30 yrs old, coming off a major injury; price tag won't be as high as many think.30 years old, high price tag - go ahead bengals
Lets be clear here, first it was not that major an injury, he had a broken leg, not a knee injury or such.30 yrs old, coming off a major injury; price tag won't be as high as many think.
That said, I ONLY like this for them if it is a short term (1 yr, 2 yr max) deal for reasonable money. Or....a longer deal that is back loaded in which he will never see. He does do a lot of things that can help him, but only for another year or two IMO. Kinda reminds me of when Thomas Jones left Chicago for the Jets at 29. He had his best 2 years at age 30 and 31.....then went down hill very quickly. I can see Fred Jackson following a similar track.
he is unless the tagged him; I don't believe he has been extended, has he?
Good info Bob, not sure why I was under the impression that he was FA....GM Buddy Nix said he wants Fred Jackson to finish his career as a Bill.Jackson is entering the final year of his contract and wants a new deal. The problem is that he'll be 31 in February, is coming off a fractured fibula and C.J. Spiller emerged in a big way down the stretch. The Bills may force Jackson to play out his contract in 2012. Jan 9 - 11:19 AMSource: Rodney McKissic on Twitter