Jeremy Langford value

[ExperiencedRookie]

Guy is hard to figure out, that's for sure.

He's in a great situation considering that he appears to be a 3 down back that you can get in the early middle rounds. He showed as a rookie that he can put up decent games when Forte was down. He can hit the goal line. He can catch.

Trouble is...that offensive line, and maybe the offense in general, doesn't look the greatest. His tape isn't terribly impressive either.

What say you? Better play in standard? PPR? You buying or selling on this guy?

 

[cctekguy]

I'd be ok rolling with him as my RB2 if I went WR heavy early on.

 

[Phicinfan]

I'd be ok rolling with him as my RB2 if I went WR heavy early on.

agree, have the same feeling

 

[Remote Controller]

I have him a weak #2 in any format, and would only roll with him as a #3 on my squads if I'd even roster him.

 

[ExperiencedRookie]

I have him a weak #2 in any format, and would only roll with him as a #3 on my squads if I'd even roster him.

Just so I have a point of reference here(and because I live to needle you) where does CJ Anderson stack up against this guy?

 

[mudloggerone]

 

[Remote Controller]

CJ is much better!
I have CJ at 12 and Langford at 26.

-full disclosal- I will draft neither

 

[ExperiencedRookie]

CJ is much better!
I have CJ at 12 and Langford at 26.

-full disclosal- I will draft neither

Whoa?? You're off the CJA train? Say it ain't so. How come?

Why not draft Langford? What RBs in his range do you prefer?

 

[Remote Controller]

I skip this range somewhere after Martin and Lacy then rejoin with Gordon, Ivory, and Crowell. IBL team is Peterson, Ingram, Gordon, Crowell, Starks at RB