Lacks the qb to fit the ball thru the tight windows which makes him 2 steps slower. He is a VERY weak #2 Wr or a servicable #3.Guy did burst on the scene last year for what, 91 catches?
What is your assessment of him in redraft leagues?
How soon is too soon?
Orton is the problem, not Royal. Orton will noy allow Royal to be a top 10 WR ever, in my opinion. Orton can find Marshall, but can't put the ball where Royal is, or is gonna be.Eddie Royal will be a top 10 WR by the end of 09. I think he will have around 100 receptions, 1100yds, and 6 TDs. Way too many people thinking Cutlers departure is the end of Royals production. Mcdaniels system saw Welker go for consecutive 100+ reception years, and I think they use Royal the same way. Royal is a more polished route runner and better pass catcher than Marshall already. Orton doesnt need to be Cutler for Royal to improve on his 08 season as I think the system and Royals talent outweighs the QB change. Royal was the strongest WR at the 08 scouting combine, and was drafted by Shannahan to be a weapon in the return game(which he was early last year) but he quickly showed that he had what it took to be a starting WR right out of the gate. How many receptions did he have last year in what was essentially 14 games? Yeah a lot. So lets see....Very fast, runs good routes, has good hands, coming off a very productive rookie year, in a great system. Please tell me what im missing. Ok Denver might not throw as much as they did last year, but I bet they throw to Royal as much as they did last year. His ADP on MFL for real PPR drafts was at 4.11 the last time i looked and I think thats a good value for him.
I think youre giving Cutler too much credit and underestimating Orton. Good WRs get their share. Look at Calvin last year or Roddy White in 07. ill put 90 rec 900yds and 6 TDs or equal production in PPR as a baseline in production. Care for a sig bet on that?Orton is the problem, not Royal. Orton will noy allow Royal to be a top 10 WR ever, in my opinion. Orton can find Marshall, but can't put the ball where Royal is, or is gonna be.
I think your numbers are high. However, I do think Royal becomes Welker West. I think high 80s to mid 90s in receptions. Close to 1000yds receiving is very doable. If Marshall can stay out of trouble, and keep the double teams...it could edge higher for royal.Eddie Royal will be a top 10 WR by the end of 09. I think he will have around 100 receptions, 1100yds, and 6 TDs. Way too many people thinking Cutlers departure is the end of Royals production. Mcdaniels system saw Welker go for consecutive 100+ reception years, and I think they use Royal the same way. Royal is a more polished route runner and better pass catcher than Marshall already. Orton doesnt need to be Cutler for Royal to improve on his 08 season as I think the system and Royals talent outweighs the QB change. Royal was the strongest WR at the 08 scouting combine, and was drafted by Shannahan to be a weapon in the return game(which he was early last year) but he quickly showed that he had what it took to be a starting WR right out of the gate. How many receptions did he have last year in what was essentially 14 games? Yeah a lot. So lets see....Very fast, runs good routes, has good hands, coming off a very productive rookie year, in a great system. Please tell me what im missing. Ok Denver might not throw as much as they did last year, but I bet they throw to Royal as much as they did last year. His ADP on MFL for real PPR drafts was at 4.11 the last time i looked and I think thats a good value for him.
for all of you that are completely dismissing Orton....He has a record of 21-12, threw for about 3000yds 18TDs/12ints in 15 games last year. The Chicago passing game is more consevative than Mcdaniels system. Hes only 26 and has much better recieving options than he had in Chicago. Eddie Royal will get his
right. NE attempted 527 and how many receptions did Welker have? Again, youre underestimating Royal, the system, and to a lesser extent the QB. JMO, of courseThat makes him a perfectly serviceable "real-life" QB. Unfortunately, intangibles aren't normally counting statistics in most FF leagues. Royal will not sniff 90 catches simply because Orton (or Simms) will not be throwing 616 passes this season. That's how many Cutler threw last year. To add context, the Colts (Manning/Sorgi) only attempted 585, New England only attempted 527, and Drew Brees only attempted 19 more than Cutler.
And I can't even take a one year sample size and say Royal is already better than Marshall. Anyone remember Michael Clayton?
I see the everything stacked for him, not against him.6'4", 215 with good hands, crisp route running and just enough speed didn't make you think Clayton had staying power? I was drinking that Kool-Aid straight from the top of Kool's big dumb head right before he crashed through the wall of my living room. I refer to him (Clayton) often when analyzing 2nd year WR's who excelled as rookies as a cautionary tale.
I stated earlier that I think very highly of Royal's skillset, and I actually do think Orton is solid in a game manager role. There's just too much stacked against Royal due to the offseason changes to allow for the volume of passes to come his way that would enable him to repeat last year's stats.
I think youre giving Cutler too much credit and underestimating Orton. Good WRs get their share. Look at Calvin last year or Roddy White in 07. ill put 90 rec 900yds and 6 TDs or equal production in PPR as a baseline in production. Care for a sig bet on that?
Uh, in case you haven't noticed.............Marshall is coming off Hip surgery, threatening holding out....oh and still facing suspension if he gets any penalty from his upcoming trial.Royal is a different WR and in a much different situation than both of those guys.
Cal and Roddy are true #1 and more like Marshall than Royal.
Ill put 90 rec 900yds and 6 TDs or equal production in PPR as a baseline in production. Care for a sig bet on that?