Foster's catch and run should have been a TD

mudloggerone

mudloggerone

Outlaw
Administrator
rotoworld,
Mike Pereira, the NFL's vice president of officiating from 2004-09, believes Arian Foster should have been awarded a touchdown for a three-yard catch that was overturned on review Sunday.

Of course it was a catch, but that's small consolation for Foster owners. Pereira points out that Foster reached out with his right hand to break the plane, making the "second act" that the league has cited in the past. If the NFL wasn't such an unstoppable juggernaut, the league would be losing credibility for its ridiculous catch rules. How can the players and fans understand what constitutes a catch when the referees don't even know how to interpret the rules?
Source: FoxSports.com





I'm not reading nearly as much about this play as the one by C Johnson in game one. Did y'all miss the play or perhaps agree with the ruling? Pure BS IMO.
 
Pereira is the last guy who should be commenting. All these BS calls are his fault. I remember when he was in charge and used to give a different reason every week just so he could justify what his officials had done. Now it is just a focked up mess
 
I'm hoping that it will be a catch and a lost fumble if it happens this week. I'm going up against him.
 
im confused too... I mean, was that really diff then the Megatron TD? How was the Megatron TD incomplete, but this should be a TD?

confusing.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top